Shop in your local currency and language

Choose another country or region to see specific content for your location and shop online.

United Kingdom
Downstream bioprocessing, Filtration, Process development

Supor™ Prime filter performance with high-risk fluids

Oct 30, 2024

Bacterial challenge testing of sterilizing-grade filters with high-risk fluids

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the performance of Supor™ Prime sterilizing-grade filters through bacterial challenge testing, using several complex fluids that represent a higher risk of bacterial penetration.

Supor™ Prime filter discs showed complete bacterial retention at both 0.34 bar (5 psid) and 2.76 bar (40 psid) with the four complex fluid types tested. These were:

  • Lipid emulsion.
  • Empty lipid nanoparticles.
  • DNA-filled nanoparticles.
  • Cholesterol-based liposomes.

Introduction

Although bacterial penetration of sterilizing-grade filters rarely occurs, it still remains an industry-wide challenge, with observations that some complex fluids (such as liposomes and emulsions) may lead to an increased incidence of penetration by Brevundimonas diminuta (B. diminuta) (1-4). Due to these observations, we developed several complex surrogate fluids to aid in the development of a new generation of Supor™ Prime filters that have shown improved performance with these challenging fluid types.

Our Supor™ Prime filters consist of a range of sterilizing-grade filters, designed for high throughput of high concentration biotech drugs and other challenging feeds.

Bacterial retention testing of sterilizing-grade filters consists of two types of challenge tests:

  • Test 1: During sterilizing-grade filter development and manufacturing, filters are tested and validated using water or a buffer in accordance with the principles of ASTM F838 (5).
  • Test 2: Prior to use of a final sterilizing-grade filter in a pharmaceutical process, it is necessary to perform a process-specific filter validation to demonstrate that the filter will perform as expected (1, 6, 7, 8). One aspect of this validation includes a bacterial retention test with B. diminuta under simulated process-specific conditions with actual product. This bacterial challenge must demonstrate complete retention of B. diminuta by the test filter when challenged with a minimum of 1 × 107 colony forming units CFU/cm2 effective filter area (EFA).

Appendix 1 highlights how validation of sterilizing-grade filters used for final sterile filtration of a drug product is a regulatory requirement.

Methods and materials

B. diminuta ATCC No. 19146 was used to conduct the bacterial challenge tests.

Filter discs were used for testing and were subjected to both pre- and post-challenge bubble-point tests as per standard procedure. All testing was performed in triplicate.

Test fluids:

  1. Lipid emulsion, tested at 5 and 40 psid, with a volume throughput of 14.5 mL/cm2 (equivalent to 145 L/m2).
  2. Empty lipid nanoparticles tested at 2.1 bar (30 psid) with a volume throughput of either 5.1 mL/cm2 (51 L/m2) or 14.5 mL/cm2 (145 L/m2).
  3. DNA-filled lipid nanoparticles tested at 30 psid with a volume throughput of either 5.1 mL/cm2 (51 L/m2) or 14.5 mL/cm2 (145 L/m2).
  4. Cholesterol-based liposomes, tested at 5 and 40 psid with a volume throughput of 14.5 mL/cm2 (145 L/m2).


The test filters were autoclaved at 121°C for 1 h. At least one 0.45 µm rated control filter was tested for each batch of challenge fluid to confirm the B. diminuta was appropriately sized and monodispersed.

Results and conclusion

Supor™ Prime filter discs showed complete retention with all fluids at both 5 and 40 psid and at all challenge volumes. These results assert the high performance of Supor™ Prime sterilizing-grade filters when used with complex and challenging process fluids, that can represent a higher risk for bacterial penetration.

The bacterial challenge test results show that Supor™ Prime filters are highly retentive when tested with these highly penetrative fluids, giving confidence for success with process specific filter validation in real-world applications.

Full results and test data are displayed in Tables 1 to 4 below.

Table 1. Results for bacterial retention testing of Supor™ Prime (0.2 µm rated) filters using a lipid emulsion (n = 3)

Part number

Lot number

Pre-challenge bubble point (bar) (water-wet)

Post-challenge bubble point (bar) (60/40 IPA/water-wet)

Area challenge (CFU/cm2)

Total challenge (CFU/filter)

Total recovery (CFU/filter)

Titer reduction

Test pressure: 0.34 bar (5 psid)

FTKASF

NW0274

Pass

Pass

4.2 × 107

5.8 × 108

0

> 5.8 × 108

FTKASF

NW0669

Pass

Pass

4.2 × 107

5.8 × 108

0

> 5.8 × 108

FTKASF

NW0668

Pass

Pass

4.2 × 107

5.8 × 108

0

> 5.8 × 108

Test pressure: 2.76 bar (40 psid)

FTKASF

NW0274

Pass

Pass

4.2 × 107

5.8 × 108

0

> 5.8 × 108

FTKASF

NW0669

Pass

Pass

4.2 × 107

5.8 × 108

0

> 5.8 × 108

FTKASF

NW0668

Pass

Pass

4.2 × 107

5.8 × 108

0

> 5.8 × 108

Penetration control (0.45 µm rated)

NXG047100

YA4294

Pass

Pass

4.2 × 107

5.8 × 108

Confluent

Not applicable

NXG047100

YA4294

Pass

Pass (water-wet)

4.2 × 107

5.8 × 108

Confluent

Not applicable

*1 bar = 14.5 psi = 0.1 MPa

Table 2. Results for bacterial retention testing of Supor™ Prime filter discs (0.2 µm rated) using an empty lipid nanoparticle at 2.1 bar (n = 3)

Part number

Lot number

Pre-challenge bubble point (psi) (water-wet)

Post-challenge bubble point (psi) (60/40 IPA/water-wet)

Area challenge (CFU/cm2)

Total challenge (CFU/filter)

Total recovery (CFU/filter)

Titer reduction

Test pressure: 2.1 bar (30 psid)

FTKASF

NW0274

Pass

Pass

6.1 × 107

1.8 × 108

0

> 1.8 × 108

FTKASF

NW0669

Pass

Pass

6.1 × 107

1.8 × 108

0

> 1.8 × 108

FTKASF

NW0668

Pass

Pass

6.1 × 107

1.8 × 108

0

> 1.8 × 108

Penetration control (0.45 µm rated)

60173

T51682

Pass

Pass

6.1 × 107

5.8 × 108

Confluent

Not applicable

*1 bar = 14.5 psi = 0.1 MPa

Table 3. Results for bacterial retention testing of Supor™ Prime filter discs (0.2 µm rated) using DNA-filled lipid nanoparticles at 2.1 bar (n = 3)

Part number

Lot number

Pre-challenge bubble point (psi) (water-wet)

Post-challenge bubble point (psi) (60/40 IPA/water-wet)

Area challenge (CFU/cm2)

Total challenge (CFU/filter)

Total recovery (CFU/filter)

Titer reduction

Test pressure: 2.1 bar (30 psid)

FTKASF

NW0669

Pass

Pass

4.2 × 107

5.8 × 108

0

> 5.8 × 108

FTKASF

NW0274

Pass

Pass

4.2 × 107

5.8 × 108

0

> 5.8 × 108

FTKASF

NW0668

Pass

Pass

4.2 × 107

5.8 × 108

0

> 5.8 × 108

Penetration control (0.45 µm rated)

60173

T51682

Pass

Pass

4.2 × 107

5.8 × 108

Confluent

Not applicable

*1 bar = 14.5 psi = 0.1 MPa

Table 4. Results for bacterial retention testing of Supor™ Prime (0.2 µm rated) filters using a liposome (n = 3)

Part number

Lot number

Pre-challenge bubble point (psi) (water-wet)

Post-challenge bubble point (psi) (60/40 IPA/water-wet)

Area challenge (CFU/cm2)

Total challenge (CFU/filter)

Total recovery (CFU/filter)

Titer reduction

Test pressure: 0.34 bar (5 psid)

FTKASF

NW0668

Pass

Pass

7.2 × 107

1.0 × 109

0

> 1.0 × 109

FTKASF

NW0275

Pass

Pass

7.2 × 107

1.0 × 109

0

> 1.0 × 109

FTKASF

NW0274

Pass

Pass

7.2 × 107

1.0 × 109

0

> 1.0 × 109

Test pressure: 2.76 bar (40 psid)

FTKASF

NW0669

Pass

Pass

7.2 × 107

1.0 × 109

0

> 1.0 × 109

FTKASF

NW0274

Pass

Pass

7.2 × 107

1.0 × 109

0

> 1.0 × 109

FTKASF

NW0797

Pass

Pass

7.2 × 107

1.0 × 109

0

> 1.0 × 109

Penetration control (0.45 µm rated)

FTKDB

NH0743

Pass

Pass

7.2 × 107

1.0 × 109

Confluent

Not applicable

*1 bar = 14.5 psi = 0.1 MPa


REFERENCES

  1. ISO 13408-2:2018. Aseptic processing of health care products — Part 2: Sterilizing filtration.
  2. Folmsbee M, Moussourakis M. Sterilizing filtration of liposome and related lipid-containing solutions: enhancing successful filter qualification. PDA J Pharm Sci Technol. 2012 Mar-Apr;66(2):161-7. doi: 10.5731/pdajpst.2012.00771. PMID: 22492601.
  3. Folmsbee M. Evaluation of the effect of the volume throughput and maximum flux of low-surface-tension fluids on bacterial penetration of 0.2 micron-rated filters during process-specific filter validation testing. PDA J Pharm Sci Technol. 2015 Mar-Apr;69(2):307-16. doi: 10.5731/pdajpst.2015.01026. PMID: 25868996.
  4. Johnson T, Jones K, Zourna K and Bracewell D. Using 3D imaging to understand sterilizing-grade filtration of liposomes. Bioprocess Int. 2023.
  5. ASTM F838-20. Standard test method for determining bacterial retention of membrane filters utilized for liquid filtration.
  6. FDA-2003-D-0145. Guidance for Industry: Sterile drug products produced by aseptic processing – current Good Manufacturing Practice.
  7. EudraLex – Volume 4 – Good Manufacturing Practice (GMP) guidelines, Annex 1 – Manufacture of sterile medicinal products. 2022.
  8. PDA Technical Report No 26 (TR26) Revised 2008, sterilizing filtration of liquids. PDA J Pharm Sci Technol. 2008; 62:1-60.

APPENDIX 1

Food and Drug Administration (FDA): “A sterilizing grade filter should be validated to reproducibly remove viable microorganisms from the process stream, producing a sterile effluent” (6).

EudraLex: “Sterile filtration of liquids should be validated in accordance with relevant Pharmacopeia requirements“ (7).

Parenteral Drug Association (PDA): “Filter manufacturers typically publish results of tests performed according to applicable compendial methods to qualify the filter as suitable for pharmaceutical applications. This qualification documentation supports, but does not replace, performance qualification as part of process validation conducted by the filter user” (8).

International Organization for Standardization (ISO): “Liquid-sterilizing filtration shall be validated during initial process qualification by an appropriate bacterial challenge test using at least one filter from each of not less than three lots of filters with three consecutive successful outcomes” (1).

 

CY47097-DDMM24-AN

Supor™ Prime filters
High throughput sterilizing grade filters for high concentration biotech drugs and other challenging feeds.

Did you find what you were looking for?